The University of Wisconsin-Madison Skip navigationUW HomeMy UWUW Search
UW-Madison > Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis > {history}  

 faculty students emeritus visiting international scholars staff admissions academics people news reference about

Eric M. Camburn

Assistant Professor
Senior Researcher,
Consortium for Policy Research in Education

1186C Educational Sciences
1025 W Johnson Street
Madison, WI 53706
Email: ecamburn@education.wisc.edu
Phone: (608) 263-3697
Fax: (608) 265-3135

Education

Ph.D., University of Chicago (1997) Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistical Analysis (MESA) program.
M.A., University of Chicago (1989) - Social Science Divisional Masters Program.
B.A., Illinois Benedictine College (1983), Sociology.


Research Interests

Eric Camburn’s research focuses on urban public schools and their improvement. His early work documented the difficulty poor and minority students in urban schools have in negotiating the transitions from elementary school to high school and from high school to postsecondary education. His current research centers around understanding efforts to improve instruction in urban schools; including programmatic efforts to improve instruction; the organizational factors that support such improvement efforts; and the impact such change efforts have on leadership practice, instruction, and student achievement. In support of his research on instructional improvement in urban settings, Camburn’s current work also focuses on the measurement of instruction and leadership practice. Much of Camburn’s research involves the use of multi-level statistical models, but he has also conducted a number of mixed-method investigations. Camburn and his co-authors won the William J. Davis Memorial Award for the most outstanding article in the journal Educational Administration Quarterly in 2000.

Sponsored Research

The Study of Instructional Improvement

The Study of Instructional Improvement (SII) is a program of research designed to improve our knowledge about both instructional improvement in high-poverty elementary schools and the educational practices in such schools. The study focuses on schools’ responses to research-based, comprehensive, school-reform models. SII focuses on three of the best-known and most widely-implemented models: the Accelerated Schools Program, America’s Choice, and Success for All. The study examines how the interventions are designed, how they operate, and what effects they have on instruction, organization, leadership, and student achievement in a large sample of high-poverty elementary schools. The study is intended to increase knowledge about such interventions and to help educators use that knowledge to inform and improve practice. SII also aims to develop and test more general ideas about instructional improvement and to use those to inform and improve practice. Camburn is a member of a team of CPRE investigators at the University of Michigan who designed and conducted the SII. Camburn’s writing from this study focuses on organizational supports for instructional improvement, the effect of instructional improvement efforts on student achievement, and the measurement of instruction.


Evaluation of the National Institute for School Leadership.

This study involves an evaluation of a promising professional development program for school principals, the National Institute for School Leadership (NISL). The study will be conducted by CPRE researchers at the University of Wisconsin, the University of Michigan, Northwestern University, Vanderbilt University, and the University of Pennsylvania. NISL is a district-level strategy that is designed to improve student achievement by arming principals with the knowledge and skills needed to lead instructional improvement efforts in their schools. It is an intensive two-year program intended to prepare principals to be outstanding instructional leaders within the context of standards-based accountability systems. The primary objective of this evaluation is to assess the effects of NISL participation on school principals’ practice and their knowledge, particularly practices and areas of knowledge that are thought to support instructional improvement. A secondary set of objectives is to examine connections between institute participation, principals’ practice, teachers’ efforts to improve their practice, and student achievement. Third, this project will make progress in our ability to address leaders’ practice through new measurement tools. A central feature of the research design will be a randomized, delayed-treatment design that compares 20 elementary school principals from a single urban school district who are randomly assigned to participate in NISL in Year 1 of the study with 20 principals from the same school district who are randomly assigned to a group that receives the treatment one year later. Camburn’s writing on this study will investigate organizational supports for the improvement of principals’ practice and the association between principal leadership and teachers’ efforts to improve their practice.

Selected Publications

  • Rowan, B., Camburn, E., and Correnti, R. (Expected publication, 2007) Teacher logs as a tool for studying educational process. In Belli, R., Stafford F. and Alwin, D. (Eds).  Calendar and Time Diary Methods: Measuring Well-Being in Life Course Research (pp. 246-271). Thousand Oaks, CA:  Sage Publications.  pdf icon word icon

  • Rowan, B., Camburn, E., & Barnes, C. (2004). Benefiting from comprehensive school reform: A review of research on CSR implementation. In C. Cross (Ed.), Putting the pieces together: Lessons from comprehensive school reform research (pp. 1-52). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform.

  • Camburn, E., and Barnes, C. (2004). Assessing the validity of a language arts instruction log through triangulation. Elementary School Journal, 105, 49-74.

  • Rowan, B., Camburn, E., and Correnti, R. (2004). Using teacher logs to measure the enacted curriculum: A study of literacy teaching in third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 105, 75-102.

  • Camburn, E., Rowan, B., and Taylor, J. (2003). Distributed Leadership in Schools: The Case of Elementary Schools Adopting Comprehensive School Reform Models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 25(4), 347-373.

  • Bryk, A., Camburn, E., and Seashore Louis, K. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly. 35 (Supplement, December), 751-781.

  • Roderick, M., and Camburn, E. (1999). Risk and recovery from course failure in the early years of high school. American Educational Research Journal. 36(2), 303-343.

  • Camburn, E. (1990). College completion among students from high schools located in large metropolitan areas. American Journal of Education. 98(4), 551-569.

 

 

GO:

School of Education | UW Home